register

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Letters to the Editor

Positive oversight After reading the article on positive-pressure attack in the January issue, I'm very concerned that the authors downplayed several serious operational and safety concerns in their efforts to promote the use of positive-pressure ventilation. The presentation of the article is clearly intended to refute common PPV apprehensions, however, the potential consequences of misapplication of PPV are very seriously understated. The title “Positive Reinforcement” and the front-cover headline “PPV Myths Debunked — 20 Reasons to use Ventilation Fans For Positive-Pressure Attack” both emphasize that the objective of the article is to convince firefighters and fire chiefs that ...

To continue reading this article, please register or login – it’s quick and free…

Member Login

Enter your email address below, and we'll email your password.

Are cookies enabled in your browser?

This site uses cookies and session data to keep track of your name and preferences while you're logged in. You cannot login without enabling cookies.

One Step Registration

Fill out the form below for instant access to the page you’ve requested.

Website members also receive access to our entire archive and may apply for a complimentary subscription to our print magazine.

All fields are required Personal Info
  Required Must be a valid email
  Required Passwords must match
  Required
  Required
  Required
  Required
  Required
  Required
  Required

Fire Chief Magazine


Submit the form for instant access to the page you've requested.

 

Read an exclusive interview with the former Director of the Department of Homeland Security as he discusses the perils facing our first responder community.

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

 

 

Resource Center

Events Advertise JobZone RSS
October 2009 FIRE CHIEF Cover

Featured Links